Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hibbard, F.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hibbard, F.
Right arrow Articles by Baum, S
American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, Vol 38, Issue 5, 690-692
Copyright © 1981 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Delivery time in a decentralized pharmacy system without satellites

FJ Hibbard, JA Bosso, LW Sward, and S Baum


The time required for pharmacy to deliver medications to the nursing unit under centralized and decentralized unit dose drug distribution (without satellites) systems was compared. Routing slips were attached to physicians' drug orders generated at a surgical nursing unit. Under the centralized system, the ward clerk sent the order to the pharmacy via pneumatic tube; the pharmacist received the order, transcribed it, and prepared the medication; and supportive personnel delivered the drug to the nursing station. The time required to perform each step was recorded on the routing slip for a five-week period. Under the decentralized system, the ward clerk placed the physicians' orders in the pharmacy box on the nursing unit. The pharmacist picked up the orders, filled them from a decentralized master medication cart, and placed the drug in the nurses' medication cart. Time required to complete the medication process was significantly less under the decentralized system than under the centralized system (54.15 +/- 42.82 versus 83.80 +/- 48.16; p less than 0.05).
 






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.