Am J Health-Syst Pharm
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Posey, L.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Posey, L.
Right arrow Articles by Thomson, P.
American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy, Vol 38, Issue 5, 659-662
Copyright © 1981 by American Society of Health-System Pharmacists


Articles

Comparison of two methods for detecting microbial contamination in intravenous fluids

LM Posey, RE Nutt, and PD Thomson


An aliquot sampling method and a qualitative membrane filltration method of microbial detection in intravenous infusion solutions were compared. One-liter plastic bags of total parenteral nutrition solutions were contaminated at approximately 1000, 100, 10, and 1 organisms per liter using clinically isolated strains of Escheichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Candida albicans. Ten-milliliter aliquots of the solutions were injected into blood culture bottles to test the aliquot method. All remaining fluid was filtered through the Addi-Chek system to test the filtration method. Samples were incubated at 30 degrees C for 10 days and inspected daily for turbidity. The aliquot sampling method consistently detected each of the four organisms at levels of 100 organisms/liter and above. The membrane filtration method consistently detected all levels of contamination (as few as four organisms/liter). The aliquot sampling method is inexpensive and easy to use but may fail to detect some contaminated solutions. The qualitative membrane filtration system will detect all levels of contamination but is more costly in both time and money, and its reliability has not been assessed objectively.
 



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
B. Thompson and L. A. Robinson
Invited Review: Infection Control of Parenteral Nutrition Solutions
Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 1991; 6(2): 49 - 54.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Nutr Clin PractHome page
D. W. Newton and S. C. Augustine
Purity Assurance in Nutrition Prescriptions
Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 1986; 1(2): 100 - 106.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1981 by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.